Jdonalds,
What do you mean by "charge the car 100% with home solar"? I have solar panels as well but when I charge my car it goes into the mains just like everything else. Do you have another arrangement?
Ozy, You are correct to call this into question. After a year of solar and Clarity I've learned that this isn't always true, and over a years time it isn't true at all for us.
I'll give two cases:
1) Lets say it's mid summer, the sun is high in the sky, and the days are long. The solar system is working at max, supplying close to 6KW. The house is using 3KW. Before I plug the car in I'm pumping 3KW back into the grid. We have net metering so the grid is acting like a battery for me, storing that extra power I don't need at the moment. The meter runs backward. I plug the car in which needs what, 7KW is it? So the solar system now sends that extra 3KW to the car and the grid supplies the other 4KW. It takes 2 hours and 10 minutes to fully charge the car. So we've used about 10KW or so from the grid. Then the load once again drops back to 3KW for just the house and the solar begins to pump it back into the grid. So some power is stored in the grid before plugging the car in, and more is pushed to the grid after the car is charged. Over the whole day we are net positive with the grid. On these best days our solar pumps out 50-52kw. Just as an example say we start out negative since the sun went down last night, but by the end of this day solar has made up for all we used from the grid and still pushed more power out to the grid. We have then fully operated the house, and charged the car, all on solar power. Yes the grid was involved but at the end of the day we are net positive and we don't owe the power company anything. Hence my comment that the car was charged 100% solar. If only this was true every day...
2) Now comes the dead of winter. Rainy season in California. Days are short. The sun is low in the sky. Some tall trees now shade part of the solar. Full cloudy days obscure the sun. Rain further hinders light hitting the panels. Daily solar production is almost non existent. I've recorded as low as 100 watts generated for a whole day. I groan as I push the button on the inverter and see the low level of generation. The car and the house are fully powered by the grid. Ugh! Full sun winter days can generate 25KW for a day. In the summer our system pumps out 50KW or more each day; a megawatt each month.
Net for a year... its a loss. But now we've had solar and the car for over a year. Year over year we paid $1844.68 in 2017 for electricity, and just $291.55 in 2018. In 2017 we didn't have a plug in car. So that $291.55 includes charging the Clarity which we often do twice a day. We banked quite a bit of power in the summer which the electric company graciously store (so to speak) for us until winter (sort of).
This disappointing chart shows the effect of nearly a year of this give and take. If the slope is up we're using more grid power than we're pumping to it. If the slope is down we're banking power. Things should be slightly better in 2019 for several reasons. First that first segment was rising because our inverter was clipping at 5KW so we were unable to take full advantage of the panels. We changed the inverter and also added two more panels. Then we had the huge Carr fire which put thick smoke in the air for six to eight weeks, cutting our solar production. Please God no more fires. I'm anxiously awaiting the turn in this chart when we produce more power than we use.
The other good news of course is we bought much less gas in 2018 than 2017, even though the car the Clarity replaced was a Prius. All together we realized a $2,500 cheaper year due to solar and using less gas. By the way we've only ever charged the car at home. Tonight the car has 22,742 miles on it. My wife and I share the car while the 2005 4Runner (13 mpg in the city) stays parked most of the time.
I've come to realize it would be too expensive to try to make our netmetering come out to $0 at the end of a year. That would require more solar panels, a higher capacity inverter, and trimming some trees ($750). As our electricity is not TOU there would be no benefit to adding a Tesla power bank; the grid already acts like a bank for us. Also if we were to add a battery bank we'd have to add more panels to charge it. As batteries deteriorate over time the benefit reduces over time.
I've also realized that even having a Tesla battery would fail to do the job all the time. We just came out of a period of about a week when we didn't see the sun and it rained continuously for at least 50 hours during that week. We've had 9 inches in January so far. The battery wouldn't be charged by solar and would provide no power for several days. As I said a TOU plan might make a battery a good value.
So on a daily basis we can experience several months of 100% solar charging the car. Sadly for even more months that isn't true.
Summer months the biggest draw is the air conditioner. Our summers are brutally hot (which I love) with highs of 100-112 for several weeks. AC runs 24/7. Still the solar, mid summer, can feed the AC beast, the rest of the house, and the car. Fortunately heat in the winter uses much less power than the AC in summer.
As I said you were smart to point this out. Having solar has been a learning lesson. What is your situation Ozy?