<see actual quotes, below?
>>> How do you like the fuel cell powertrain?
It is OK. It's no Tesla, for sure. But good. Probably controlled by speed and acceleration governors, is my guess. But it is smooth and peppy. I can definitely accelerate away easily from most ICE cars at a stop light. The Clarity seems to appeal to Boomers. (Sorry; I am one.)
>>> How does the cost per mile for fuel compare with the Clarity Hybrid?
I don't pay much attention, because
FUEL IS FREE. Honda (and maybe Toyota and Hyundai?) provides $15,000 in free hydrogen fuel over three years. Most drivers do not exceed that, I am told. At least I haven't. That plus a relatively low lease rate ($400 per month), HOV sticker, and big check from California (I think $5,000) were what sold me on trying this experiment out for three years. Good financial incentives.
I think fuel costs ~$16.45 per kilogram in northern California. Maybe 4-5 kg in a tank; I don't know. (You do NOT let the tank empty, though.) That is a little high, but should eventually drop if the fuel cell experiment eventually takes off and there were more competing fuel centers. I'm told it cost $1-2 million per fuel station. Plus it's a regulatory hassle.
I believe that to fill the car up it is a little more than filling the equivalent Accord (or whatever) with premium gas. So not cheap, but tolerable, maybe. But like I said--
FREE! There would probably be few people driving these if that was not true.
>>> Most of us have no experience with fuel cell tech.
I understand. The fuel cell is an old idea (early 1900s?). NASA used fuel cells on the Apollo missions of the '60s. It is basically a way to chemically/physically convert hydrogen and oxygen into electricity (free electrons stored in on-board batteries) and a little water. No combustion. No pollution (by the car). Just as safe (or not safe) as a gasoline car. More quiet. Less heat. BVlah, blah...
There are some great discussion on this and other forum sites debating hydrogen-powered versus electrical-grid powered electric car economies and futures. I am left thinking that hydrogen is
not the viable long-term solution, but I do not know for sure. And it appears to me to be worth trying out
now, as we are doing with hybrid cars. The hydrogen thing somewhat mimics gasoline (e.g., quick fill ups at for-profit company-owned fuel centers), so is maybe more palatable to some drivers and to corporate America.
I kind of like the Tesla (and other electric car) model, but that has its share of problems, also. We desperately need (a) better batteries, (b) faster charging equipment, and (c) more of those things. For example, I hear that driving a hydrogen car from Sacramento to LA is no problem (assuming the single fueling station at Harris Ranch is working, which it usually is). If it is, fueling takes little more time that filling up with gasoline. That's convenient. No gasoline bill for visiting grandma at Thanksgiving. Meanwhile, there are more Tesla (and other) recharging centers along that route. but "speedy" charging takes, what, up to an hour or two? And there can be long lines (e.g., at Thanksgiving) for superchargers.
What
is clear to me is that gasoline and diesel are on the way out. Glad I lived to see changes like that (along with the start of basic human rights improvements, too) in my lifetime. But it is just the very beginning of the end for those fuels. How long the full transition will take is an open question. The coming super pickups (Tesla, Rivian, Bollinger, etc.) may help convince a lot of guys (sorry--and gals),
if they perform.
Meanwhile, super fuel cell race cars at Le Mans soon!