The worst, nothing but pure sht and lies (keep in mind about 6 firms control the US media):
NBC News (owned by Comcast and GE) Comcast does more than anyone save possibly for AT&T to
censor our speech and hence our rights and GE as a defense contractor would lose money over less
needless wars.
Wall Street Journal (represents garbage like UBS, Goldman, Morgan... Cowen.. on and on and all the
shill 'analysts.")
BBC (this is pure oppressor media)
LA Times
NY Times
Wired
Slate
Business insider
Reveal
Mercury News
The Verge
Ars Technica
Endgadget
Gizmodo
Quartz
Extreme tech
Yahoo Finance
Daily Beast
Recode
Co-conspirators for these entities include lots of venture capital firms and 'investment' banks that will go bust when a pin like Tesla is taken to the sht ballon of derivatives insuring junk petrol debt as happened in 2007 under Bush.
Typically negative and inaccurate
Bloomberg
Washington Post
Vanity Fair
Fortune
Forbes
Digital Trends
Jalopnik
CBS News
ABC News
MIT Technology Review
Half & half but not particularly accurate
Edmunds
Consumer Reports
Seeking Alpha (a paradoxical split between the worst liars, and some of the best and most accurate)
USA Today
Barrons (Forbes)
Detroit Free Press
The Guardian
Even Al Jazeera and RT are way more accurate the the entities above. There is still Pacifica (increasingly corrupted by covert sponsorship) and Paul Jay's Real News Network but there is very little that isn't at the blog level that is honest at this point- it can't be sponsored and be honest it is impossible because sponsorship is about bribery only if ever about product sales as a very remote second.
Contrast with generally accurate or at least more positive:
Teslarati
Clean Technica
Elektrek (sometimes wonder if Lambert pinch hits for the shill side)
Insideevs (better and better but one annoying writer that adds shill type spin)
NBC News (owned by Comcast and GE) Comcast does more than anyone save possibly for AT&T to
censor our speech and hence our rights and GE as a defense contractor would lose money over less
needless wars.
Wall Street Journal (represents garbage like UBS, Goldman, Morgan... Cowen.. on and on and all the
shill 'analysts.")
BBC (this is pure oppressor media)
LA Times
NY Times
Wired
Slate
Business insider
Reveal
Mercury News
The Verge
Ars Technica
Endgadget
Gizmodo
Quartz
Extreme tech
Yahoo Finance
Daily Beast
Recode
Co-conspirators for these entities include lots of venture capital firms and 'investment' banks that will go bust when a pin like Tesla is taken to the sht ballon of derivatives insuring junk petrol debt as happened in 2007 under Bush.
Typically negative and inaccurate
Bloomberg
Washington Post
Vanity Fair
Fortune
Forbes
Digital Trends
Jalopnik
CBS News
ABC News
MIT Technology Review
Half & half but not particularly accurate
Edmunds
Consumer Reports
Seeking Alpha (a paradoxical split between the worst liars, and some of the best and most accurate)
USA Today
Barrons (Forbes)
Detroit Free Press
The Guardian
Even Al Jazeera and RT are way more accurate the the entities above. There is still Pacifica (increasingly corrupted by covert sponsorship) and Paul Jay's Real News Network but there is very little that isn't at the blog level that is honest at this point- it can't be sponsored and be honest it is impossible because sponsorship is about bribery only if ever about product sales as a very remote second.
Contrast with generally accurate or at least more positive:
Teslarati
Clean Technica
Elektrek (sometimes wonder if Lambert pinch hits for the shill side)
Insideevs (better and better but one annoying writer that adds shill type spin)