The supposed offended shorts, as opposed to those just insuring their Tesla investment, have apparently been a cover for the petrol industry and those overly exposed to it all of which are very threatened by Tesla and with the short games running PR against Tesla. In effect the petrol industry and its cronies and silver spooners are trying to manipulate the stock price down to starve Tesla of capital. Could see that in the revelation that the 'Montana Skeptic' was a petrol front petrol/employee and his having to retreat on account of his actual status as a paid petrol shill or agent of the petrol industry when his conflicts were exposed- it was people telling lies because they were paid to tell lies or worse because their continued employment depended on it kind of thing or shade of it.
What is outrageous is that to protect shorts Nasdaq apparently suspended trading for an hour. There is no question about the language" CONSIDERING taking Tesla private (if) funding secured." Can't remove the implied "if" because of the sentence beginning wit the word "considering," and can't remotely remove it because of the context above and the the obvious advantages that make it desirable and because Musk runs other large private companies. So yes, short burn of the century and no double standard will serve to stop it. No more deserving group for this result, but still need to see the full liquidation of the short positions. Tesla is at about all time high, what kept it from going above today (interruption or manipulation by NASDAQ on behalf of petrol shorts and petrol industry?)
Hypocrisy of a suit would seem to be beyond belief and hopefully quite frivolous. Shorts were never betting for anything but a continuation of petrol corruption and the slavery its spreads.
Short losses are forever but Tesla stock always bounces back. What are their cumulative losses so far- 25 billion- most of that is coming from petrol subsidies, the public needs to put a stop to that?
Why would these gamblers and speculators have any standing , why would this group of clowns be able to pass along their gambling losses. Why would Tesla have any duty to them, especially since it wasn't even the legitimate use of insuring possible losses. These scam artists think law is supposed to aid and abet their scams. And look non other than the W. Admin SEC commissioner is whining about this, how predictable. And look how vulnerable their thesis is to tiny intimations from a CEO which shows they had nothing worth losses beyond their investment in their own delusions.
The shorts are not legitmate, Tesla is. This is what is outrageous. Are other firms being shorted likes this? No absolutely not because the short position is total BS predicated on the rent seeking fossil fuel being able to continue to steal the means of production when Tesla is proof that enclosure has been utterly destroyed as it should have been 7 decades ago.
Also hearing this potential move called 'privatization.' That is quite a confused characterization, "privatization" is almost by definition a form of theft where a bit of actual public property or commons is made forfeit and turned into a rent seeking toll road for a rich parasite or becomes a way to kill a needed public program by claiming the cancer of privatization didn't improve it but killed it so it wasn't workable while relieving the tax burden on a non-contributing parasite class and unjustly enriching one of its members for engaging in more theft.
What is outrageous is that to protect shorts Nasdaq apparently suspended trading for an hour. There is no question about the language" CONSIDERING taking Tesla private (if) funding secured." Can't remove the implied "if" because of the sentence beginning wit the word "considering," and can't remotely remove it because of the context above and the the obvious advantages that make it desirable and because Musk runs other large private companies. So yes, short burn of the century and no double standard will serve to stop it. No more deserving group for this result, but still need to see the full liquidation of the short positions. Tesla is at about all time high, what kept it from going above today (interruption or manipulation by NASDAQ on behalf of petrol shorts and petrol industry?)
Hypocrisy of a suit would seem to be beyond belief and hopefully quite frivolous. Shorts were never betting for anything but a continuation of petrol corruption and the slavery its spreads.
Short losses are forever but Tesla stock always bounces back. What are their cumulative losses so far- 25 billion- most of that is coming from petrol subsidies, the public needs to put a stop to that?
Why would these gamblers and speculators have any standing , why would this group of clowns be able to pass along their gambling losses. Why would Tesla have any duty to them, especially since it wasn't even the legitimate use of insuring possible losses. These scam artists think law is supposed to aid and abet their scams. And look non other than the W. Admin SEC commissioner is whining about this, how predictable. And look how vulnerable their thesis is to tiny intimations from a CEO which shows they had nothing worth losses beyond their investment in their own delusions.
The shorts are not legitmate, Tesla is. This is what is outrageous. Are other firms being shorted likes this? No absolutely not because the short position is total BS predicated on the rent seeking fossil fuel being able to continue to steal the means of production when Tesla is proof that enclosure has been utterly destroyed as it should have been 7 decades ago.
Also hearing this potential move called 'privatization.' That is quite a confused characterization, "privatization" is almost by definition a form of theft where a bit of actual public property or commons is made forfeit and turned into a rent seeking toll road for a rich parasite or becomes a way to kill a needed public program by claiming the cancer of privatization didn't improve it but killed it so it wasn't workable while relieving the tax burden on a non-contributing parasite class and unjustly enriching one of its members for engaging in more theft.
Happily bought one more put at a discount. Will see if this makes me rich or not 
