ICE cars do this stuff all the time but its only news when its petrol/ICE's radically better replacement that does it.
Seems to me what is going on is the typical Machiavellian PR people for petrol who very much believe the Goebbel's assertion that if you repeat a lie loud enough and often enough, for long enough it will become accepted and right now they are trying to use this approach to associate with a couple themes they think were already present in the public consciousness to help make the lies seem more plausible and less outlandish.
You see some years ago some Lexus (Toyota) vehicles did have stuck accelerators that caused some deaths, including the death of a policeman if memory serves. So they try to play on that. Did those Lexus vehicles actually have that problem or were the Machiavellians messing with Toyota over the trojan horse Prius? Don't know. And of course it is true that a Tesla can accelerate like nothing else if you intend it to which is the other point they want to connect to and try to paint it as a disadvantage. Another one of their stupid Nazi press tricks- and this one is total tell-tail is to always try to paint the opponents strengths as a weakness e.g., acceleration is a strength so it must be bad. This right here really helps you spot their lies. Oh Tesla's accelerate like nothing else well then say that makes them not the better competitor but makes their products dangerous, but do it through repetitive implication.
My personal sense of this is the petrol villains are just paying people to have accidents and faking accidents and using crisis actors and all the BS they do ( for context these people push pre-emptive war to make their obsolete product seem relevant)- wouldn't be shocked if they didn't have various corrupt paid-for politicians and agencies helping them. Notice that when the accidents seems more real like someone jumping a creek in a model 3 and planting in a tree and walking away unscathed- the shill media doesn't want that because it wasn't manufactured. I think that person worked for Tesla- so they can't touch that because it's not a crisis actor.
Note Sandy Munro's review. He talked of defense type tech in the electronics, that plays on the subsidy angle- and there may have been some of that a while back under Obama, but petrol is pure welfare never not underwater so it tries to project this on green stuff which isn't. Munro makes some points about too many sub panels, fine but criticizes wasted material in the body- whereas it may well be a safety feature as Tesla says but the press turns it into a case where Tesla is using Dinosaur tech (usless Bloomberg,) notice Munro's initial claim was all makers have Dinosaur areas of tech that they must engage to make a car and Tesla is struggling with the simple stuff- that message goes out but possibly even before it went out it was tuned so they could riff on it and say Tesla uses Dinosaur tech- again try to pain a strength Tesla's superior technology as an actual weakness. Notice Munro was suggesting that Tesla should have prioritized bean counting and cost cutting over safety again trying a comparative Tesla strength as an advantage. A bit like trying to get away with complaining that air bags are a waste of money to criticize a competitor for using them. You can see why Musk refuses to give the idiot press or lie manufacturing industry money as not giving them money is simply the right thing to do. Imagine that we give these people money in elections so that they can turn everything including law and honest discourse about our unnecessarily declining standard of living into bribery and criminality.
Every dollar spent on ICE is a dollar going for another unnecessary war. Also the financial sector has a huge conflict of interest in reporting on petrol because they have been totally held hostage by insuring petrol debt with all of that debt tied to political and economically stranded petrol assets in a way that isn't remediable which makes that debt and insurance of it total junk. But they have this sunk cost and Tesla will sink them because petrol has already sunk them. Its inevitable. But they out themselves when they tell the truth about Tesla so they tell lies.
What is going on here with Auto Pilot is petrol panic over self-driving autonomy because self-driving quite foreseeable catalyzes pump cutting electrification of everything like nothing else. It also drives their panic over guaranteed annual incomes because if they can't enslave people with wage slavery or worse they lose their illegitimate evil power. Takes more skill to drive than to do 90% of jobs so it becomes even on an unconscious level clear that labor is over when driving is over which means capital is over- but labor being over and hence capital being over was recognized 50 years ago by people paying attention who subsequently response took all the wrong steps especially with petrol. Clearly part of why the USSR collapsed- after all what was the reason for its being 20 years after the permanent collapse of capitalism- the end of capital was presciently predicted by Keynes. I am pretty sure the people folding up the USSR shop thought things would go better otherwise why give up?
So for petrol and so-called elites generally automation (auto pilot and wage slavery free factories) is unsafe, because it leads away from the safety they find in having people enslaved in useless helpless positions that treadmill the life out of the victims so they can't resist and certainly can't rise up against the oppression. Ask yourself what the fair wage is? What is the true competitive wage? It is the wage that allows the worker to become a direct competitor of the employer- at this point employment is crime- has been for a long time at least 50 years. Ask yourself what the maximum wage should be?
Continued in next post-
Seems to me what is going on is the typical Machiavellian PR people for petrol who very much believe the Goebbel's assertion that if you repeat a lie loud enough and often enough, for long enough it will become accepted and right now they are trying to use this approach to associate with a couple themes they think were already present in the public consciousness to help make the lies seem more plausible and less outlandish.
You see some years ago some Lexus (Toyota) vehicles did have stuck accelerators that caused some deaths, including the death of a policeman if memory serves. So they try to play on that. Did those Lexus vehicles actually have that problem or were the Machiavellians messing with Toyota over the trojan horse Prius? Don't know. And of course it is true that a Tesla can accelerate like nothing else if you intend it to which is the other point they want to connect to and try to paint it as a disadvantage. Another one of their stupid Nazi press tricks- and this one is total tell-tail is to always try to paint the opponents strengths as a weakness e.g., acceleration is a strength so it must be bad. This right here really helps you spot their lies. Oh Tesla's accelerate like nothing else well then say that makes them not the better competitor but makes their products dangerous, but do it through repetitive implication.
My personal sense of this is the petrol villains are just paying people to have accidents and faking accidents and using crisis actors and all the BS they do ( for context these people push pre-emptive war to make their obsolete product seem relevant)- wouldn't be shocked if they didn't have various corrupt paid-for politicians and agencies helping them. Notice that when the accidents seems more real like someone jumping a creek in a model 3 and planting in a tree and walking away unscathed- the shill media doesn't want that because it wasn't manufactured. I think that person worked for Tesla- so they can't touch that because it's not a crisis actor.
Note Sandy Munro's review. He talked of defense type tech in the electronics, that plays on the subsidy angle- and there may have been some of that a while back under Obama, but petrol is pure welfare never not underwater so it tries to project this on green stuff which isn't. Munro makes some points about too many sub panels, fine but criticizes wasted material in the body- whereas it may well be a safety feature as Tesla says but the press turns it into a case where Tesla is using Dinosaur tech (usless Bloomberg,) notice Munro's initial claim was all makers have Dinosaur areas of tech that they must engage to make a car and Tesla is struggling with the simple stuff- that message goes out but possibly even before it went out it was tuned so they could riff on it and say Tesla uses Dinosaur tech- again try to pain a strength Tesla's superior technology as an actual weakness. Notice Munro was suggesting that Tesla should have prioritized bean counting and cost cutting over safety again trying a comparative Tesla strength as an advantage. A bit like trying to get away with complaining that air bags are a waste of money to criticize a competitor for using them. You can see why Musk refuses to give the idiot press or lie manufacturing industry money as not giving them money is simply the right thing to do. Imagine that we give these people money in elections so that they can turn everything including law and honest discourse about our unnecessarily declining standard of living into bribery and criminality.
Every dollar spent on ICE is a dollar going for another unnecessary war. Also the financial sector has a huge conflict of interest in reporting on petrol because they have been totally held hostage by insuring petrol debt with all of that debt tied to political and economically stranded petrol assets in a way that isn't remediable which makes that debt and insurance of it total junk. But they have this sunk cost and Tesla will sink them because petrol has already sunk them. Its inevitable. But they out themselves when they tell the truth about Tesla so they tell lies.
What is going on here with Auto Pilot is petrol panic over self-driving autonomy because self-driving quite foreseeable catalyzes pump cutting electrification of everything like nothing else. It also drives their panic over guaranteed annual incomes because if they can't enslave people with wage slavery or worse they lose their illegitimate evil power. Takes more skill to drive than to do 90% of jobs so it becomes even on an unconscious level clear that labor is over when driving is over which means capital is over- but labor being over and hence capital being over was recognized 50 years ago by people paying attention who subsequently response took all the wrong steps especially with petrol. Clearly part of why the USSR collapsed- after all what was the reason for its being 20 years after the permanent collapse of capitalism- the end of capital was presciently predicted by Keynes. I am pretty sure the people folding up the USSR shop thought things would go better otherwise why give up?
So for petrol and so-called elites generally automation (auto pilot and wage slavery free factories) is unsafe, because it leads away from the safety they find in having people enslaved in useless helpless positions that treadmill the life out of the victims so they can't resist and certainly can't rise up against the oppression. Ask yourself what the fair wage is? What is the true competitive wage? It is the wage that allows the worker to become a direct competitor of the employer- at this point employment is crime- has been for a long time at least 50 years. Ask yourself what the maximum wage should be?
Continued in next post-