The 2020 Mercedes-Benz EQC revealed in production form with official specifications

Discussion in 'EQC' started by Domenick, Sep 4, 2018.

  1. The camo has finally come off the production version of the 2020 Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC, as it is officially known, and the official specs have been published. First the photo...behold:

    [​IMG]

    Official specs:

    Drivetrain: Dual motor all-wheel-drive. 402 horsepower, 564 lb-ft of torque
    0-to-60: 4.9 seconds
    Top speed:112 MPH (electronically limited)
    Battery size (usable): 80 kWh
    Range: (approximately) 200 miles (320 km)
    Efficiency: 22.2 kWh/100 kWh
    Onboard charger: 7.4 kW
    DC fast charging: 40 minutes for 10%-80%
    Maximum charging current: 110 kW
    Wheel size: 19-inch, 21-inch optional
    Dimensions: Length 187.4”
    Width w/mirrors 82.5” | w/o mirrors 74.2”
    Height 63.9”
    Wheelbase 113.1”
    Curb Weight (lbs) TBA
    Drive modes: Comfort, Eco (features haptic accelerator pedal), Max range, Sport, and Individual (customizable!)

    Price: To be announced.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Sep 5, 2018
  2. Ok, Autogefühl has just given us a nice bit of video exploring the inside and outside of the car, including running through a lot of the controls. A must-watch.

     
  3. gooki

    gooki Well-Known Member

    Nice video by Autogefühl.

    I like the more station wagon look, vs a high SUV.

    The 'electric art' styling elements look terrible. The AMG exterior is much nicer. Even has a decent rear end. Shame about the interior, not a fan.

    Odd choice of double flap the charge port.
     
    Domenick likes this.
  4. I still haven't had time to watch the whole thing, which sucks because I'm a big Autogefühl fan. But yeah, I was a little disappointed by the styling. I was expecting to like the exterior -- I certainly like the concept -- but it just doesn't quite work for me. Maybe with a bit of time...

    I do like some elements of the interior but that dash just falls apart for me design-wise. For me, it's mostly the screen. It too long and not well incorporated into the dash. I'd prefer two screens. Impressed that the leather substitute has a good hand, close to the real thing.
     
  5. gooki

    gooki Well-Known Member

    The screen, the terrible vents, the controls under the vents, the excess of buttons on the strrering wheel, the visible seat controls. I find in appealing which is a shame.

    The seats, and door liners look good.
     

Share This Page