Sponsor captured conglomerated media is terrified of Tesla on Twitter

Discussion in 'General' started by 101101, Mar 9, 2019.

To remove this ad click here.

  1. 101101

    101101 Well-Known Member

    Sponsored media is finally being directly disintermediated with Twitter. Now the so-called Tesla Investors (saboteurs- presumably Black Rock, ISS, MSNBC et. al.) that want to burn the first amendment because its harming bribery and corporate vandalism and financial vandalism have decided to sue Tesla in the name of defending bribery based sponsored media against Twitter and Tesla's trend setting effective use of political speech and advocacy. They are now joining the SEC in the action they instigated with the SEC against Tesla's use of Twitter.

    This is one of the biggest assaults on free and useful political speech in American history and I think we will see the SEC can't allow the original claim to looked at or seriously revisited it can't have any transparency. Not surprised at all if it starts spouting about bs national security claims which would get to the heart of where we're going with this which is government is not entitled to any kind of secrecy as state secrecy is not only antithetical to privacy but also to to free speech and just and functional government and further expediency claims cannot be used to stop due process. Hoping Wikileaks comes through for what is coming. We have to find a way to make all forms of government secrecy impractical.

    Part of what is happening is sponsored media and its speech enclosure of the US consists of 6 companies that try to determine everything that the American public is allowed to know based on highest bidder payments from big corporations or cartels or foreign entities and countries and this is known as sponsorship covered by the notion that the actual purpose is product sales. It is not, its actual purpose is to productize the citizenry and strip the citizenry of its power.

    When Tesla succeeds in communicating directly with the public via Twitter that sponsorship is cut out of the loop, it can't pre-spin stuff and it is in a reactive position looking properly stupid facing anger and blow back from its sponsor bribers. When Tesla succeeds without paying for access to the artificially enclosed public mindshare the whole sponsored media franchise of lies is at stake and they complain bitterly about social media and claim it is being manipulated in a vanta black pot calling a kettle black kind of way- but for instance just look at the number of dual citizenships in the higher ranks of these media conglomerates and look at where their focus is, its on the Mid East not the US- even their personnel is sponsored in this captured media that leads to captured government.

    So once again when they are allowed to do what they want they profit from highest bidder political candidate filtering as a way of silencing the public before the voting ever begins- think of it as media gerrymandering, but again they also engage in highest bidder censorship and spin beyond that and with twitter that whole system is getting bypassed so they for instance try to gag through a corrupt agency like the SEC any precedent setting user of free speech e.g. Tesla from using its CEO to spread material news through Twitter. Think of how utterly stupid the SEC's demand is on its surface and very likely in its depth over and over its about not being able to communicate material info by Twitter. Ask why the venue matters and the reasons the SEC provides don't seem remotely good enough. Their problem with Twitter is its missing the sponsor filter and surely they were angling given their obvious bias or the bias of the people puppeting the SEC for shill to filter Musk, you could even see it in the shill media interview Leslie Stahl did with Musk where she was giddy with the idea that Musk would be gagged and censored. And look at where this leads would we rather have our government captured or made into a puppet for a Mid East state or Russia or Exxon, or Monsanto or AG Farben or Halliburton or Black Water or Wackenhut or the British East India Company or the Queen? We don't want sell out traitorous intermediaries manufacturing highest bidder law and its coercive culture.

    But with regard to Twitter being a material platform, public entities generally do a speculative budget which they publish as guidance and then they do final budgets which they also publish do you see the difference here and in both cases its done electronically? And then look again at how inaccurate the sponsored media coverage is of this stuff and even the SEC's own claims at face value appear to be in-accurate. The SEC never proved fraud about anything and shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt on that but media pitches it as if they did. SEC also tried this stupid contractual arrangement which was supposed to be above question and challenge as if this were an act of leniency instead of taking advantage of the public and of Tesla shareholders and of Musk. Our system curtails speech in many ways most importantly in order to protect political speech but this stuff appears to be the opposite of protecting vital political speech, it is an arbitrary gag order. A former member of the SEC board said the original decision was bad and apparently there is a whole community that considers it unbelievably bad. Is a Herodian SEC attempting to create martyrs? What is the logic?

    So again if a company like Tesla is successful then we see the speech enclosure and the artificial scarcity of the whole sponsor filter mechanism can be bypassed and the whole rent seeking narrative is bypassed meaning they can't do things like make people work more hours to increase control and keep them down. So Twitter bypasses and they don't get to do their little exclusive stories, they are put in the back where they belong because we need real media reconstruction- we need media rid of the conflicts of interest down to its very charter- they act like only these corporations have speech and everyone has to be filtered by them and has to bribe and pay them off to communicate- they are suppressing citizen speech and claim immunity for doing so, but also claim the right to lie to the public for money and even mislead the public about matters of public health like climate change. So we have a media based on a extreme conflict of interest. This is why Wikileaks is the most valid and viable media or medium out there.
     
  2. To remove this ad click here.

  3. 101101

    101101 Well-Known Member

    Is the SEC part of a concerted effort to foist "fail convincingly" on Tesla?
    GM has a whole history of apparent intentional fail convincingly on EVs? You have to wonder if the Trump administration is pushing this type of strategy against Tesla. We knew the tariffs might hit but the Trump admin targeted electric cars specifically and all of a sudden calling the Model 3 "troubled" and there were articles claiming that mass quality problems had the Model 3 turned away at the docs in China banned from entry into the country (to apparently dovetail with the bs CR was presumably paid to lie about on Model 3 quality -1800 cars construed as junk as in the article when it was nothing but a labeling mismatch (media was desperately trying to prevent Tesla from having a share price elevation stock swap instead of the bond payment) at the same time they tried to claim that Tesla's were death traps with failing breaks and fire prone. And look at all the obvious BS stories that have come out of Florida.

    Is the Trump admin out to get Tesla or is the sponsored media just trying to paint that picture or both? Just today Clean Technica reported the Trump admin is trying to cut renewables research by 70%. Recently there was one of these phony financial analysts trying to invoke the Trump admin to come down hard on Tesla in the regular media. So it looks like a case of trying to create a fail convincingly situation on Tesla. Where was the so called main stream media coverage of the Model 3 being the top selling vehicle for the 2nd half of 2018 in CA and outselling the F150 by 40% in CA) The Trump admin was recently accused of trying to nix the merger of Time Warner and AT&T, a good idea, but if you can't block it then nationalize but Trump is accused of trying to block it for petty revenge. Is it more of the same here?

    It is glorious if Tesla dies achieving its mission but not one second before the mission is achieved. That means Musk is necessary for the 2nd half of the road map. Romney called Tesla a cult and that bs accusation is coming up again but consider the source Mr. chop shop. Is the survival of humanity a cult issue? Most of the Fortune 500 in the US need to have their charters yanked because they are just a pile of useless non-contributing rent seeking with little social utility but that isn't the case with Tesla.

    I don't think it matters if Tesla survives in the long run (like to see it fund SpaceX) but I think it could be helpful if GM and Ford and the other ICE makes went under as long as productive capacity was re-purposed to green- sure there would be job loss but that is why we need a high indexed GAI to cover people being displaced by automation. But short term Tesla is vital and vital as Musk has called it by his time line and with the products he's pointed out. Wired does some good stuff but its also a shill rag, but notice the hit piece it recently did on Musk. And now the employee surveys and normally reliable Bailey Gifford suddenly saying Tesla would be better off doing to Musk what Apple did to Jobs before he left.

    Seems at least a few major but apparently conspiratorial and stupid things that have happened:

    1. What happened in Nevada with NRG and all that where they were breaking contracts with consumers, the stuff that involved Buffet that hurt Solar City. Where was the useless SEC on that? They reversed net metering in favor of a natural gas monopoly and people ended up with greatly inflated bills and then the media blamed Tesla when Solar City had to leave Nevada because of the damage done by their PUC to privilege obsolete natural gas in contract breaking ways- that was public private corruption where was the investigation and publication of that. And when Gates says people shouldn't divest because only a hand full of people own the fossil fuel equity and don't sour the good will of these people that is outrageous on its face but does that include his friend Mr. Buffet.

    2. The whole SEC thing- it really looks like the deal was blocked and gaged by the USG and now the SEC out of pure unadulterated corruption is trying to milk it with further speech encroachments. The new claim seems ridiculous. Musk parrots what was in the quarterly financial papers but then adjust down and the SEC idiotically says his claim is inaccurate. Does the SEC have a crystal ball for production numbers that haven't occurred yet? What Musk said was still within the range quoted by the the company released financial numbers on production range. So what the SEC is saying is that increased accuracy within the range is inaccurate and forbidden to disclose. The SEC apparently never proved its case in the damage it did against the company in the first place it just apparently harassed and threatened at a time it must have known was crucial. Again how would it know it was inaccurate was Tesla told it could only produce so many cars by some government entity?

    3. The string of accidents in Florida that were catastrophic for Auto Pilot early on back to the breaking of the partnership with Mobil Eye.
     

Share This Page