Are EV owners more scared of COVID-19 than ICE owners?

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by FloridaSun, May 5, 2020.

To remove this ad click here.

  1. marshall

    marshall Well-Known Member

    That was my thinking.

    I suspect you aren't going to see many grocery clerks, nurse's aids, pharmacy techs and so on affording a new EV. I've only seen one EV at the local fire station, Audio e-tron; they drive pickup trucks and gas SUVs.

    On top of that, where are you going to go if everything is shut down except essential services? Where you going to get the money?
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020
  2. To remove this ad click here.

  3. ericy

    ericy Well-Known Member

    This makes sense to me. I telecommute, and have been "sheltering" since some time in Feb. We have a comfortable place, and I rarely need to go out - there isn't much open anyways. I can do yardwork on the weekend, or ride my bike if the weather is good. But I am fortunate - not far away there is a chicken processing plant and the number of cases there are quite high. They don't have the option of working from home.

    For me the main place it gets me is that I can't go and visit my 98 year old mother in a nursing home - they are closed to all visitors and have been for a while now. I can do Zoom once in a while - that's the best I can do.
     
  4. As BlueKona stated in an earlier post, this is what matters, and here is a link. Old news actually, data has been available for a couple of weeks.
    https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/doctors-shut-downs-counter-decades-of-medical-science-overestimation-of-fatality-rates-caused-unwarranted-panic/article_2aaf567c-8e51-11ea-868b-5f5b518155a4.html
    Death rates are MUCH, MUCH lower than previously reported.

    Furthermore many covid-19 deaths in nursing homes are never actually diagnosed and confirmed by a test. In Belgium, for example, they claim that "About 95% of Covid-19 deaths in elderly care homes haven’t been diagnosed, yet Belgium makes the decision to register them based on the symptoms shown and who the people have been in contact with."
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-25/why-the-world-s-highest-virus-death-rate-is-in-europe-s-capital
     
  5. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    Sure.. (all legitimate sources, no tabloids)

    Prison Tests

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8256949/In-4-U-S-state-prisons-nearly-3-300-inmates-test-positive-coronavirus-96-without-symptoms.html

    University Studies

    https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2020/04/21/los-angeles-study-backs-stanford-researchers-conclusion-about-high-prevalence-of-covid-19

    ALSO, about 85 to 90% of all deaths had pre-existing conditions.. The chance of someone without pre-existing conditions to die from it is virtually zero..
    Many different sources confirm that the infection rate is likely 10 times higher than official numbers and deaths are overstated as things like suicide, murder or drug overdose are counted as COVID19 deaths if the dead person had COVID19 or just symptoms.. I can link up several articles showing that people's death is recorded as a COVID 19 even if they clearly died due to another cause..
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020
  6. No one is actually performing autopsies on COVID-19 deaths. There is one German state that actually did autopsies on ALL confirmed COVID-19 deaths. It's the state of Hamburg and they had about 90 deaths or so.

    100% of the autopsies showed major pre-existing conditions like transplants or heart attacks, etc.
     
  7. To remove this ad click here.

  8. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    exactly.. This is the most exaggerated pandemic ever.. A healthy person has probably less than 0.1% to die from this virus IF infected..
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2020
  9. ericy

    ericy Well-Known Member

    To say these people had pre-existing conditions, doesn't mean that this is what they died from. All you can really say is that people with those conditions might be more likely to die if they get coronavirus. In the U.S., about 75000 people are now dead, and if there had been no coronavirus, nearly all of them would still be alive.

    Having rows of refrigerated trailers parked outside of NYC hospitals as temporary morgues isn't normal. It isn't something we have seen in past years. I don't recall ever having seen this, in fact.

    One of the "pre-existing conditions" is just being older. If you are older than 60, for example. People I know in that demographic are taking this very seriously. Once you get to 70 or 80, the concern only grows.

    A few anecdotes about deaths from drug overdoses or people being possibly incorrectly recorded as covid don't interest me. Anecdotes aren't a useful way to discuss this, and that just leads us down the path of comparing stories.

    Another way to look at it is by considering "excess death". What this means is looking at the total number of people that died of all causes this year, and comparing it to what they would have expected (by comparing to previous years, for example):

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/05/05/us/coronavirus-death-toll-us.html

    In the article, they compare the official count of covid deaths to the number of excess deaths, and you can see that there is a significant undercount of covid deaths.
     
  10. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    In most states, there have been more deaths from the flu than from COVID-19. I personally think that the REAL death rate is about 0.2% of those infected which is about twice the mortality rate of the flu. The flu kills between 40k and 60k people in most flu seasons, so we can expect about 80k to 120k people to die from COVID-19. I'm pretty sure that the lockdowns did not make a huge difference due to the fact that most people with covid-19 don't have symptoms and unknowingly passing it on to others.
    The state only asks people with symptoms to be tested which leaves the majority of those who have it untested... and spreading it... As I pointed out, it appears that over 90% of those who have or had COVID-19 do not have any symptoms. It's close to impossible to stop it from spreading if those infected don't know that they have it.. Lockdown or no lockdown, the outcome is likely about the same. It's like fighting an invisible enemy. My guess is that about 120k people in the US will be dead when this is all said and done. The ONLY thing that could stop the spread is to test every single person in the country and isolate those infected, but logistically, this isn't possible, so the virus will run it's course just like the flu does every flu season. While 120k dead people sounds like a lot, considering that we have 350 million people in this country, it's a very small percentage..
     
  11. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    The IMPORTANT number is how many people are infected. To get an accurate death rate, you need to know the amount of people who have or had the virus and the current number of those infected is likely only about 5 to 10 percent of the official number.
     
  12. To remove this ad click here.

  13. Seems like an unfeeling way to look at it, but I think you are right. What we don't know also now, is how many people will die, or die later prematurely because they had their elective surgery delayed. And then there are the broken families and suicides because of the economic recession.
     
  14. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    People are more likely depressed and commit suicide because of the consequences of the shut down.. I personally think that the shut down is makeing a minimal difference than just letting the virus run it's course. It's just like a more deadly version of the flu. It sucks but what sucks even more is that our economy is crippled by the shut down and the lives of 50+ times more people than died of COVID-19 are being destroyed by the shut down. It's really a no win situation..
    I think that this virus should be taken VERY serious by elderly people and those with significant health issues but they should let otherwise healthy people back to work. The chance of someone < 60 years old without pre-existing conditions to die from COVID-19 is probably in the range of 0.02%...
    Personally, I had very little impact from the shut down.. Had to reduce the rent for my tenants temporarily but that's about it.. Still got my job.. I'm actually investing in real estate and for me, I would actually benefit from the misery of others as I pick up cheap foreclosures, fix them up and flip them. The more foreclosures, the cheaper the prices will be.. However, I rather make less profit and have people back to work and NOT lose their homes than making all that profit on my flips..
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2020
  15. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web Well-Known Member Subscriber

    I'm not ready for ouija board metrics.

    Bob Wilson
     
    Fastnf likes this.
  16. Paul K

    Paul K Active Member

    bwilson4web as you are a retired engineer I want you to know that you have my respect for your grey matter capacity. I may not agree with your politics but listen to what you say with interest. "Statistics" I once read somewhere "can be used like bikinis". Which is to say they reveal a lot of suggestive materials while concealing the essentials. So the stats show this only slightly worse than the seasonal flue? I'm confused. In my life time I can't remember:

    - Any country having to bring in military trucks to move bodies as the local morgues overflowed.
    - Any U.S. state having to excavate an area for a mass grave
    - So many residents of retirement homes dying at once.
    - Care workers at senior's homes catching the bug and dying.
    - Outbreaks in meat packing plants and workers dying.
    - etc. etc. etc.

    Sometimes I feel the human consciousness is like a narrow flashlight. What you see depends on where you shine the light.
     
    Harvey likes this.
  17. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web Well-Known Member Subscriber

    "Are EV owners more scared of COVID-19 than ICE owners?"
    • COVID-19 - late Dad was a pathologist, family practice, KU medical school instructor, Army doctor, State of Kansas Chief Medical officer, and County Coroner. Mom has degrees in accounting and nursing. Brother George is a nurse; brother Will is a radiology tech and; brother Dave does actuary for Blue Cross and Blue Shield. It wasn't until college that I learned we are not supposed to dissect my steak, turkey, chicken, or fish at dinner. So I've had exposure to medical terms and methods and that includes reading with comprehension, published medical articles. My understanding based on current Federal public health practices:
      • R-factor ~2 - each COVID-19 individual infects ~2 more which means the uninfected have to fall below 1/3 of 332 million USA citizens before the probability decreases below 1 and COVID-19 will 'run its course.' That means 222 million will have been through COVID-19
      • 80% - recover without hospitalization, 178 million recover at home
      • 14% - treated in hospitals are discharged, 31 million hospital discharged
      • 6% - die, 13 million die
      • Public health practices of China, S. Korea, New Zealand, and Australia - have successfully contained the virus and spread. These are not the practices in the USA that resemble "thoughts and prayers."
    • ICE owners - both our 2014 BMW i3-REx and 2019 Std Rng Plus Model 3 scoot across intersections faster than the other cars and reach my choice of lane about 200 m ahead of the other cars. With much sound a fury, they eventually reach me but I'm already on cruise control and they have attracted the attention of traffic officers. The Tesla has video cameras to document 360 degrees around the car and 5-star accident rating. I drive +90% using Autopilot and Full Self Driver. The BMW sometimes has a font-facing, cabin dash cam with a carbon-fibre body on an aluminum frame:
      • 38,800 traffic deaths in 2019 - 13,000,000 / 38,800 ~= 335x greater risk of COVID-19 death
    My family history was not by my design or action but an accident of birth and only offered to suggest I may have a clue.

    The bottom line, the risk of death from COVID-19 is about 335x greater than a fatal traffic accident. My EVs provide additional safety capabilities that further reduce the traffic accident risk (and increase my fun.) As for CORVID-19, I can practice good public hygiene but is a crap-shoot. Fortunately, Huntsville AL has a lot of engineers and professionals who also practice good public hygiene. But we're all waiting on: (1) better tracking; (2) vaccination(s); (3) treatment(s), and; (4) eventual death.

    Bob Wilson

    ps. Perhaps this thread has wandered off into non-EV news/technology and should go to a better forum?
     
  18. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    The problem with all the numbers is that the death rate is likely 0.2% and not 3+%. There are several pieces of evidence to suggest that the death rate numbers are wrong as 96% or so who have the virus have no symptoms at all and won't get tested. At 0.2% death rate, you are looking at 80,000 to 120,000 deaths in the US if left unmitigated which is about the same that we will have with the current policies which effectively did not help. Let's just look at this years flu numbers which are very high too.. The current policies would have slowed flu infections too of they would actually work but they didn't. The main problem with COVID-19 is that the majority who have it will never have any symptoms. It's hard to stop the spread when 96% don't know that they are passing it on. Of course we can't shut down our country like China did because we have something that they don't have.. It's called civil rights or constitutional rights. A virus does not eliminate the constitution. You can't place curfews on people without due process. (5th amendment that freedom can't be taken without probable cause or due process). A virus does not suspend the constitution!
     
  19. Paul K

    Paul K Active Member

    While another forum might be appropriate for this thread as the EV owners I'm sure you've encountered the skepticism and out right hostility the many have for EVs and green energy in general. "Just a hoax created by libtards and soy boys to suck on the government teat". They sincerely believe this and will grab any straw of stats to support their view:

    - EVs are not practical ??
    - EVs are not green because so many greenhouse gases are generated making the batteries
    - EVs are not clean. You just moved the tailpipe somewhere else (electricity generated by coal)
    - The batteries will die after 4 years.
    - The batteries are not recyclable
    - Wind turbines create more green house gases in their manufacture and eventual dismantling than they will ever save in their lifetime.
    - etc. etc. etc.

    As each objection gets disproved they just find new ones because they don't want to change their beliefs. This may look ridiculous to us but we all tend to act that way whether scientist, engineer or political hacks. Finding evidence to support what we already believe. You're a good man with numbers Bob and I respect that but this is a "novel" situation. We don't know what all the tricks the virus has up it's sleeve and how it's going to mutate. With different countries taking different approaches we'll be finding out in the next few months. Fingers crossed.
     
    Harvey likes this.
  20. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    The problem is that you can make a case for something easily if the numbers are accurate.. We can fairly accurately estimate how much CO2 it takes to produce an EV battery and how long it takes until the EV makes up for that additional CO2 to prove that they are responsible for less CO2.. If the numbers used are accurate, you can make an OBJECTIVE point. However, if the numbers are not accurate, the statistics presented won't be either. As I pointed out based on several studies that are not from conspiracy theorists but reliable sources like Universities show that the number infected is likely AT LEAST 10 times the number of those who are getting tested. This means that the death rate is much lower than expected. With so many asymptomatic people, it's close to impossible to stop the spread as people are not aware that they are spreading it. In the US, there will likely be 120k deaths from this virus as it is likely 2 - 3 times more deadly than the flu but the point is that it's not 30 times more dangerous. I doubt that the number of dead people would be significantly higher if we would not have shut down the economy. Healthy adults have close to zero chance to die from this virus.
     
  21. ericy

    ericy Well-Known Member

    If it were really the case that it is only 2-3 times more deadly than a normal flu, we wouldn't see mass graves, temporary morgues, and other such things as enumerated above. These two things are inconsistent with each other, and therefore something must be incorrect. The mass graves and temporary morgues were widely reported on the news - unless you go off deep into conspiracy-land, the only way to resolve the inconsistency is to conclude that the statement that covid is only 2-3 times more deadly must be incorrect.
     
  22. FloridaSun

    FloridaSun Well-Known Member

    Even if the death rates are accurate (despite including suicides and drug overdoses), the numer of deaths from COVID 19 ia still less than flu deaths in most US states.
     
  23. From what I've seen the average number of deaths, at least in New York City, is far higher than what it was before COVID-19, so it certainly seems like it's a serious issue.

    I don't have a lot of time (or, frankly, the energy) to track down numbers from sources that I feel comfortable with, but I have seen reports making the case that the number of COVID-related deaths has been undercounted.

    All this to say, this is a complex issue with conflicting info from different sources.
     
    Harvey likes this.

Share This Page